» » David Bowie - The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars
David Bowie - The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars Album

David Bowie - The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars Album

  • Performer: David Bowie
  • Genre: Rock
  • Title: The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars
  • Released: 1972
  • Style: Classic Rock, Glam
  • MP3 version size: 2095 mb
  • FLAC version size: 1213 mb
  • Rating: 4.5
  • Votes: 487


Five Years4:42
Hang On To Yourself2:40
Soul Love3:34
Ziggy Stardust3:13
It Ain't Easy2:58
Rock 'N' Roll Suicide2:58
Suffragette City3:25
Lady Stardust3:22
Moonage Daydream4:40


  • David BowieArranged By, Producer, Saxophone, Guitar, Vocals, Written-By


    The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars often shortened to Ziggy Stardust is the fifth studio album by English singer-songwriter David Bowie, released on 16 June 1972 in the United Kingdom by RCA Records. It was produced by Bowie and Ken Scott and features contributions from Bowie's backing band the Spiders from Mars comprising Mick Ronson, Trevor Bolder and Mick Woodmansey. The album was recorded at Trident Studios in London like his previous album Hunky Dory. Most of the. The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars - David Bowie. Лента с персональными рекомендациями и музыкальными новинками, радио, подборки на любой вкус, удобное управление своей коллекцией. Узнавайте о релизах, читайте рецензии, изучайте композиция дорожка трек-листы, рекомендации и прочую информацию о David Bowie - The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars на stardust. David bowie. Closing out classics week with an amazing album. Ziggy stardust. The London production at Sadlers Wells Opera in January 1963 was conducted by Colin Davis. The documentary was filmed at the same concert in 1973, where Bowie decided to retire the Ziggy Stardust persona. This album was also selected by the Library of Congress, for preservation in the National Recording Registry, in 2017. The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars Q&A. David Bowie - The Rise And Fall Of Ziggy Stardust And The Spiders From Mars 1972. Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin. Borrowing heavily from Marc Bolan's glam rock and the future shock of A Clockwork Orange, David Bowie reached back to the heavy rock of The Man Who Sold the World for The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars. Constructed as a loose concept album about an androgynous alien rock star named Ziggy Stardust, the story falls apart quickly, yet Bowie's fractured, paranoid lyrics are evocative of a decadent, decaying future, and the music echoes an apocalyptic, nuclear dread. David Bowie - Ziggy Stardust. artmet23. Шикарный альбом. Starman, Ziggy Stardust и Suffragette City. Юрий Юрий. это как у deepa-72-уslade-76-уgeordie-74-уsweet-74--бесподобно. Ziggy Stardust has a faint ring of The Man Who Sold the World to it - stately, measured, fuzzily electric. A tale of intragroup jealousies, it features some of Bowies more adventuresome imagery, some of which is really the nazz: So we bitched about his fans and should we crush his sweet hands . David Bowie has pulled off his complex task with consummate style, with some great rock & roll the Spiders are Mick Ronson on guitar and piano, Mick Woodmansey on drums and Trevor Bolder on bass theyre good, with all the wit and passion required to give it sufficient dimension and with a deep sense of humanity that regularly emerges from behind. His new glam image made him a global superstar and remains an iconic rock fashion touchstone. But what we love even more than the platform boots and silver lamé are the thrilling songs that drive this record, from the guitar-heavy rockers Suffragette City and Moonage Daydream, through the soulful ballads Starman and Lady Stardust to the unapologetically theatrical c


    David Bowie: все альбомы, включая Nothing Has Changed The Best of David Bowie , Legacy The Very Best Of David Bowie , Without You I'm Nothing и другие. David Robert Jones 8 January 1947 10 January 2016, better known by his stage name David Bowie ˈboʊi BOH-ee, was an English singer-songwriter and actor. He was a leading figure in the music industry and is considered one of the most influential musicians of the 20th century. He was acclaimed by critics and musicians, particularly for his innovative work during the 1970s. His career was marked by reinvention and visual presentation, with his music and stagecraft having a significant impact on. David Bowie. Bowie Official Store: . To mark that first ever BowieSchapiro cover for The Sunday Times Magazine which we posted on the 20th, we thought you'd enjoy a photo album of pictures taken from the very fine publication that is David Bowie: Photographs by Steve Schapiro. In May 1975, the same month that Tom Kelley took his famous shots of David Bowie, Steve Schapiro captured a series of remarkable images in a twelve-hour session that saw Bowie wearing a collection of new outfits posed in front of various studio backgrounds and in outside scenes, giving the impression of several sessions from different periods. David Bowie's music was evolving at an unbelievable rate in the mid-1970s. He also was taking so much cocaine that had trouble remembering making some of it, most notably his 1975 masterpiece Station to Station. There's not a lot of professionally shot footage of Bowie on the 1976 Station to Station tour, so check out him singing Stay on The Dinah Shore Show. Ilpo MustoRex. Beauty and the Beast . Biography by Stephen Thomas Erlewine. Follow Artist. The mercurial music icon widely considered the original pop chameleon and figurehead for countless musical movements. Read Full Biography. David Bowie, Soundtrack: Labyrinth. David Bowie was one of the most influential and prolific writers and performers of popular music, but he was much more than that he was also an accomplished actor, a mime and an intellectual, as well as an art lover whose appreciation and knowledge of it had led to him amassing one of the biggest collections of 20th century art. Born David Jones,. Приобретайте пластинки, компакт-диски и многое другое от David Bowie на маркетплейсе musician David Bowie died Jan. 10, after a battle with cancer. The end to his influential, decades-long career sparked hundreds of messages of grief and tribute. David Bowie, the self-described tasteful thief who appropriated from and influenced glam rock, soul, disco, new wave, punk rock and haute couture, and whose edgy, androgynous alter egos invited fans to explore their own dark places, died Jan. 10, two days after his 69th birthday. Relatives also confirmed the news but did not disclose where he died. Complete list of David Bowie music featured in tv shows and movies. David Bowie music featured in movies and TV shows: Heroes 2017 Remastered Version. Heroes 2017 Remastered Version. Play on YouTube - Heroes 2017 Remastered Version. Placebo Feat. 70,947 listeners. Julian Thome. 14,567 listeners. More artists. Top Tracks. Best of Bowie. David Bowie 1,025,875 listeners. Play album. In Consequence. Phase 1,255 listeners



Andromathris Andromathris
One of my favorite albums of all time, could listen to this over and over again.
Rexfire Rexfire
My copy unfortunately has that skipping problem on Star. Does having a better setup helps with that issue?
Ishnsius Ishnsius
Just got this pressing and just listened to it for the first time. I have never heard this album sounding so good! And I’ve heard quite a few pressings. Simply stunning!
fightnight fightnight
Echoing some of the comments here - this sounds fantastic. Good to know what you get with the Bowie represses.
Kazigrel Kazigrel
Phenomenal sound.I owned 12 different releases of this album and this is one of the best.This one and the original UK pressing are my favourites.
Agarus Agarus
Great sounding no surface noise at all and Bowies second best album after Hunky Dory.
Doomblade Doomblade
Sounds great! The dynamic range is amazing, fluctuating between quieter parts and really loud ones.
Cordalas Cordalas
I have a copy that has the same hardcover type (RCA victor front cover top right) and the vinyl centerfold black background of the RCA Victor.The Matrix runout however is like a combination of variant 1 and 2 here:(Side A Stamped): APRS 6814 12 I A1E (the E is etched)(Side B Stamped): APRS 6815 7S I A3 B (B etched)I think the I stands for an indianapolis press. Should I add my version here as a variant or should I open a new version myself ?can you help me ?
Vudojar Vudojar
Misprint: On this pressing the label shows Bowie as the author of "It ain´t" easy", but the song was written by Ron Davies.
Irostamore Irostamore
The max sold value is incorrect, I sold one of my copies for £120 2 years ago
Quphagie Quphagie
This thread discusses some issues with the 'last 10 sold' system, maybe the others I sold that aren't shown had just sold many copies in a month... Definitely very misleading system as discussed in the thread, it distorts the average value data, just an opinion i share with a few others :) I'm still thinking some data hasn't been updated as the date shown on a couple go back beyond when my copies sold. Thanks again for letting me know this anyway :) https://www.discogs.com/forum/thread/748410
Bad Sunny Bad Sunny
I thought that may have been a possibility, but I noticed others that I sold more recent that haden't been updated which i posted comments on after this too. Thanks for the input nonetheless, if you'd like links to all the others that I've left updates on let me know :)
Those stats are just from the most recent 10 that sold.
Wal Wal
Great pressing, no surface noise at all on mine, quite nice dynamics in all songs. Glad to have such a good remaster.
Madi Madi
Ive done a lot of reading about this album... if your copy skips on five years or star... its not your player,i picked up a copy yesterday and mine skips on star. Super dissaplinted this is such a great album. If you are going to buy this album make sure its from somewhere with good return policies.
Cemav Cemav
IMO, this pressing easily beats out the UK 1st pressing as well as those leading up to this reissue.More dynamic and alive, solid bass and greater overall presentation.
Gavirgas Gavirgas
Nothing bad to say really, sounds great and it's a no brainer for it's price!
Haal Haal
First copy had skipping problems on Five Years. Exchanged. Second copy was all good until Star on side two. Returned and the store had no other copies. I’m having dreadful luck with Bowie records.
Risteacor Risteacor
I added the labels from my album, the B side is a manufacturer error and is off center. Someone was sleeping!
Mustard Forgotten Mustard Forgotten
No issues with mine. Great pressing, great price. Iconic album.
Braned Braned
I picked this pressing up recently in mint condition, crystal clear.
Beabandis Beabandis
10/10. Sounds way better than my Canadian original. Top Analog Reissue. Extremely queit pressing by Optimal. AAA sound. Pick this up while they are still cheap.
I am sad to report that yet again the defect on Star is still on the record. Parlophone are an absolute disgrace. I have lost count how many I have sent back.
რฉςh რฉςh
UPDATE: Cleaned record a second time on the Okki Nokki, and then continued to play through "Star" about 5 times while very lightly dusting with Audioquest carbon fiber brush and POOF! All skips gone. Maybe give it a shot? Otherwise, this record sounds great throughout.
Jaberini Jaberini
Just opened my sealed copy and I have the same defect on Star as you. Don't know if it matters but I'm playing on a VPI Scout which has never been adjusted in any way beyond factory settings. I see you've sent multiple copies "back". Do you happen to have a link or address where I can do the same. I'm really losing faith in new vinyl.
Xisyaco Xisyaco
Many thanks. I will check out the advice and give it a try.
Oso Oso
In my case it is a "click" just as the fade-in of "Five Years" starts. Yes it had to be right at the start of the record, and in a quiet part too. I can actually see a tiny "flaw" in the vinyl with a magnifying glass. I use a brand new Fluance RT-81 table with a Linn K5 cartridge and stylus properly set up and calibrated. I played it twice and then decided I couldn't live with it, and ordered another copy, this time the DBZSLP 40 version, with the DVD-A. So far I haven't heard any problems (I'm actually listening to Star as I'm typing this). But overall my new copy version seems quieter than this one, less bassy as well.
Kare Kare
Here is a discogs forum helping people with skipping problems on brand new records. I hope it helps.https://www.discogs.com/forum/thread/731329Also FYI see the general explanation below for why this would be a problem with your set up (but also due to the 'hot' master of this record):This record is cut very "hot". In other words it is very dynamic. The large changes in amplitude cause your needle to jump at specific points in the record, which is why other people also have problems on Starman. Historically, other great and sought after pressings have had similar problems. Robert Ludwigs infamous "hot cut" of Led Zeppelin 2 is considered the most desirable by many collectors because it is very dynamic. Copies go for thousands of dollars. Unfortunately, the record had to be remastered because people with budget turntables were experiencing skipping problems."Amhet Ertegun at Atlantic heard the album (which Eddie demanded be as hot as possible) and apparently it skipped on his daughters little turntable. Instead of calling us at Sterling and asking us to lower the level a little and telling us where it skipped, they had the disk cutters at Atlantic use my EQ'd cassette file copy and they cut it WAY lower than my original cut plus, in my opinion, it sounded dull and generally not very good sounding in comparison."https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/robert-ludwig-offers-feedback-on-1969-us-led-zeppelin-ii-rl-cut.574016/I also see this issue with other great reissues. The talking heads record "speaking in tongues" by rhino is also very hot cut and sounds great, but may reviewers on amazon complain of skips on "burning down the house". I have none of these issues on my set up. Some commentators on Hoffman forums mentioned upgrading their set up, which fixed the problem.TLDR:The record is mastered amazingly well, and is great if you have a high quality set up. People with budget turntables such as Crosleys or Victorolas will have issues (or people with improperly adjusted tone arms). Upgrade /adjust your turntable and you will no longer have skipping issues.
JoJolar JoJolar
Its the exact same error as many others have had and I have had it on at least a dozen copies. I suspect it is coming down to what set up each of us use but it certainly is not our set up that is at fault. If it were a set up problem its impossible that we would all be picking up the same jumps in the same place on Star.
Winotterin Winotterin
What kind of record player do you have? My copy sounds amazing, with no defects. Playing it on a Rega RP1. The problem most likely has to do with your set up. Either your tone arm isn't set up properly, or you need to upgrade your set up.
Drelahuginn Drelahuginn
I own 9 pressings of this, one being an OG 1E 2E UK copy. I can't imagine a 1E 1E sounding any better to any given set of ears. As long as the vinyl is clean and the grooves undamaged, a 2E copy should melt your ears.
Molotok Molotok
The 1e/1e pressing has a different mix of Starman. It was remixed for the 1e/2e pressing onwards.
Antuiserum Antuiserum
Purple, yuk, what is it with all these useless colour vinyls, also they dont sound as good !
Pumpit Pumpit
One of my best albums in the collection. David Bowie is the musical Number One for me. Ever
Landaron Landaron
Hey!Why is that release not for sale ? A good friend of mine bought that LP in London and I wonder why they blocked that release from being sold to others on discogs. Thank you in advance!
Xanzay Xanzay
I think it is blocked to sell because it is a bootleg. Other stores in person might not sell bootlegs and some might, but Discogs has chose to not sell bootlegs
Redfury Redfury
Solid pressing with great dynamics. No skips or surface noise to report.
Alsardin Alsardin
To me it's one of the best and well made reissues. That 1997 Virgin Series is simply great. Maybe gotta check with the 2001 repress fro this one. But its's a repress nothing else done. So, I can't immagine that any of those others sound even or better. I'm really happy with this!
Dakora Dakora
Glad to report that the copy I purchased has no skips and hardly any surface noise. Good pressing for the buck.
Gozragore Gozragore
Very nice reissue. Competently mastered but does sound noticeably different from the other versions I have, the most obvious change is the bass guitar: in all of the other Ziggys you can hear the strings being plucked...this one, this one sounds like they’re being violently yanked off the guitar or being played with a garden spade instead of a pick (best example is during Suffragette City, gives the song a nice energetic boost that I really like). Gives the whole album a more raw/emotinal feel.Other reviews mention skipping on side B, I got lucky, got one that doesn’t have that problem
Usic Usic
Yet again another disc where it's impossible to tell the later reissue (in this case, with black labels) from the earlier originals (with orange labels) without pictures of the back sleeve -- almost 400 Discogs members have this an no-one can be bothered to upload imagery...
Dandr Dandr
images uploaded, but as stated i have a nice mispress on b side
Zamo Zamo
My copy looks more kind of brown/gold. Not sure if it's the same version.
fr0mTheSkY fr0mTheSkY
Sounds much better post-clean.Not a patch on an OP, but still a nice listenable pressing.
Reggy Reggy
Finally got round to buying this. Listening to side 2 first off. No problems there. Sound is great. Great price for a lovely piece of history.
Iesha Iesha
Sounds fantastic. Solid pressing. One small skip occurs during Star which is unfortunate. Otherwise, no complaints. Such a classic album. Rock n roll suicide is a masterpiece.
Worla Worla
Same here - sounds great! Classic album in a reissue that sounds good.
Zargelynd Zargelynd
The sound on the record is pretty good and the gold is cool. However like others I've had issues with Star and Hang on to Yourself skipping. I contacted the seller and he was quick to send me a replacement however that had similar issues. This is a problem with the pressing of record and is of no fault of the seller. It's a really cool record for collecting but probably not the best for listening to due to the common skipping issues. If you can get your hands on a lucky one with no skipping than go for it. I do highly recommend it for collectors though and the seller couldn't have been more helpful. Great communication and speedy deliverery. The record arrived in perfect condition both times too.
Eigonn Eigonn
I just got this version in a NM condition, and in my opinion it sounds very good. It has a rich sound, and the vocals float over a well balanced music. No issues found whatsoever. As a comment, I was listening to it with the treble a bit above flat in my equalizer.
Oghmaghma Oghmaghma
"Front cover of this issue has derived from US artwork, and the RCA Victor logo and US catalogue number have been pasted over. It is possible to discern a large rectangular cover over, on which the UK details are placed on top of. Look for lines that break./ not continuous. (Not to be confused with second issue cover, where JUST the catalogue number has been covered over and changed.)"Logic would suggest this to be true, and I for one believe this also to be true as it does make sense. However I am yet to find a genuine 2nd press (1E/2E) with the "second issue cover, where JUST the catalogue number has been covered over and changed". 1E/2E always seem to be housed in what this page calls the first issue cover.So many sites debate this fact and just wondered if anyone has a definitive answer to this age old question?The best answer I have found is that the 1st batch of covers which have the full paste over, wasn't issued with 1st press (1E/1E) as it was deemed inferior and replaced with a more subtle past over (just the catalogue number) which went on to house the first issued 1E/1E. The first batch covers finally got used up with 2nd pressings as it would have been a waste as so many were made. Thoughts anyone?
Zymbl Zymbl
I just looked at my original copy - by which I mean, I bought it from my local Martins Newsagents record department the week it came out - with E1/E1 and all other identifiers correct as you would expect with a first release, and it does not have a full paste over but a small catalogue change. So I think JameyB may be correct.
Barit Barit
Hi I have 3 copies of this album my 1E/1E has the full paste over ,my 1E/2E has no past over and is I think the 1st uk printed cover (neither of these 2 albums have any reference to mainman) and my last copy is a 2E/2E which has mainman on record label and cover and is slightly darker than the 1E/2E copy obviously I don't know if these are the original covers or have been changed as I didn't buy these when first released but they all seem to match up with information I have read ,hope this helps.
Broadraven Broadraven
Great sounding record overall. Love the feel of the album. No problems to report here!
Buzalas Buzalas
I got the green vinyl. Skips at 3 different points in both sides. Other than that is a decent copy.
Oveley Oveley
DOES NOBODY KNOW WHEN THIS REISSUE WAS PRINTED?It looks impossible... I really would love to know more about this press.
Yozshugore Yozshugore
Thank you man! I appreciate these precious details.And that's right, it has RCA Victor & price code HH underneath the sticker; even though someone pulled the sticker away before I got it ... but that's my copy, I'm sure about it and it's a great press. Thank you again!
Modimeena Modimeena
this was probably pressed in 1979 - should have RCA Victor & pricecode HH underneath the stickers... when the reissues for the RCA International series launched in 1980, logo & pricecodes were obscured on the old stock to match that series I believe.
Nafyn Nafyn
The music overall sounds wonderful, and side 1 is all round perfect. However, side 2, whilst still sounding good, has a huge problem skipping all the way through "Star" and a small part of "Hang onto yourself".
Vital Beast Vital Beast
picked up mine today. Quite impressed with it. Had a UK first press not in a very good shape. So this copy is for day-to-day playing and the other one is for collecting.
Gom Gom
Great album. No issues with my copy at all.
lubov lubov
Not a scratch on it, but side 2 still skips like crazy...
Uickabrod Uickabrod
I was in the Army when David Bowie swayed across America ... androgynous, beautiful, graceful, and stoked to the gills with anything that was set before him.  And me [?], I didn’t just want to be David Bowie, I wanted to be a boy, posing as a girl, stoked to the gills with anything that would make me feel no pain.  And then I remember laughing at how silly this all sounded.  Here I was, a girl, in the Army, uniformed like a boy, ducking bullets, and side stepping real pyrotechnics ... with a supply closet full of all the pharmaceuticals I could ever hope for ... in Vietnam, a country known for the best illegal substances the world had ever seen.  And on our bases the music was loud, and as I sat on the end of my cot, rubbing my hands through my short cropped hair, gazing at this album cover, I realized that I was David Bowie, in perhaps a more surreal setting than even he could have ever imagined.The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust & The Spiders From Mars was such a musical eclipsing event that this album would never be equaled by David again.  The record has all of the hooks, a great story line, and though I’m sure few would consider this to be a concept album, it certainly was.  David assembled a wonderfully fresh group musicians displaying stunningly free and conceptual ideas ... and most of all, it was theater at it’s very best.There’s not alot I have to say about this release that hasn't been said over the last thirty years, other than it must be part of your musical collection ... as much as Sgt. Pepper or Let It Bleed.  David found a way of magically transposing Lou Reed’s street wise antics, and mixing them with the space age fanfare of the day [remember, we had just walked on the moon a couple of years before], and the whole world stood at a door over which a sign read, ”ALL IS POSSIBLE.”  And for a brief moment, while Ziggy roamed free, before his capsule crashed and burned, we all believed it was true.*** The Fun Facts: The location of the film shoot. The Ziggy Stardust photo was taken outside of the K West Company at 23 Heddon Street, a small, block-long dead end street in central London, just west of Carnaby Street, with the artwork being created by Terry Pastor of Main Artery.  The building has since been painted white.The phone booth David is standing in on the back of the jacket is rumored to have been auctioned or sold to an American fan in the late Seventies, though where it is now is anyone’s guess.  At the time of the photo shoot, the phone number in the UK was +44 0207 7348 719.The character was inspired by British rock 'n' roll singer Vince Taylor, whom David Bowie met after Taylor had had a breakdown and believed himself to be a cross between a god and an alien. However, Taylor was only part of the blueprint for the character, other influences included the cult musician Legendary Stardust Cowboy and Kansai Yamamoto, who designed the costumes Bowie wore during the tour.  An alternative theory is that, during a tour, Bowie developed the concept of Ziggy as a melding of the persona of Iggy Pop with the music of Lou Reed, producing "the ultimate pop idol".  A girlfriend recalled his "scrawling notes on a cocktail napkin about a crazy rock star named Iggy or Ziggy", and on his return to England he declared his intention to create a character "who looks like he's landed from Mars".Review by Jenell Kesler
Strange thing, my copy doesn't mention "It Ain't Easy" on the sleeve (no title and lyrics). Am I the only one?
Jonide Jonide
That's normal, you may also notice the song length for Starman is completely off. These two errors on the inner sleeve were also present on the original version.
Zbr Zbr
Channels are switched on my version, so it's the first pressing I'm assuming, or was this never fixed?
Yggdi Yggdi
I'm on my 3rd copy of the new 180gm pressing. All 3 have been skipping in the same spot on Star. Returning the lastest one back to the store now. I give up. I'll have to replace it with a different record. I just thought I'd google the problem, and found this forum. Disappointed, by glad to know it's not a problem with my turntable.
riki riki
I had the same issue with "Star" on my previous turntable. After upgrading to an RP1/Carbon, it didn't skip anymore. It definitely is a fault in the pressing, but you may never know depending on the player/cartridge you own.
Uranneavo Uranneavo
Multiple skips through star here as well. Got to the point where I yelled REALLY!!! Skipped at least 10 times. Luckily that’s my least favorite song on the album, but still.... also had a small skip on the first chorus of hang on to yourself. Other than that it sounds fantastic
Sinredeemer Sinredeemer
I just got the 180g vinyl for Christmas, and it skipped all over the place on "Star". I took it back and ordered a new copy that I just got today. Exact same problem: skips all through "Star", at least 5 or 6 times. Something wrong with that pressing I guess.
Lynnak Lynnak
They are the same pressing but it is not in all copies. Glad you got a decent one :)
watchman watchman
I don't have any issues whatsoever on the one from the boxset. I was pretty sure it was the same pressing, I guess not then. :/
Perilanim Perilanim
This has been going on since the start sadly. I have had multiple copies all with the same problem as yours.
Kazijora Kazijora
This was the first album of the Parlophone reissues of David Bowie's back catalog that I picked up. It wouldn't be my last. Impressive on all fronts down to the artwork reproduction, quality pressing, and the full sounding mix. I immediately went searching for more to add to my collection. Currently, I have six of these reissues and haven't been disappointed yet. Can't wait for the reissues of Low and Heroes. Highly recommended.
Viashal Viashal
Lovely mellow 70's SQ on this pressing. Outside of the original U.K. press this would be a welcome addition to any collection. Very nice!
Malaunitly Malaunitly
Impeccable reissue, superb sound! (played on my good ol' Technics sound system and Ortofon cartridge).
Flash_back Flash_back
It says 2012 digital remaster. I think the notes are incorrect that this is remastered from analog. Sounds great though, and no skipping as some have found.
Zicelik Zicelik
When the artwork is used for a lot of albums to create the LP version, they sometimes use the digital version...it’s happened on many occasions. Rest assured, this version uses the same plates as the 2012 AAA release.
Walianirv Walianirv
The sound and pressing quality is not as horrible as made out to be. I picked up a copy today, there are no warps, skips, pops, or any surface noise. However yes I do understand the mastering may not be the best on this copy, but as someone with nothing but an mp3 to compare it too, I'm happy!
Thordigda Thordigda
This pressing uses the same AAA cut as this release (https://www.discogs.com/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-And-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/3642251), which is universally regarded. Perhaps you should check your system.
Erennge Erennge
Sound quality rocks! This release is mastered very well. Looks cheap (Best Buy series), but the sound is very good. You will be surprisedm
Swift Summer Swift Summer
Great version of Ziggy. This version has more warmth and better dynamics than even the original copy I own. If you see a good copy of this get it!
Fomand Fomand
Might not be the best pressing of this album, but it is quite good. Just a bit of surface noise and no skips in my copy. For 15€, I can't complain.
Delalbine Delalbine
my copy only skips once on star so i guess i'm lucky.
Hidden Winter Hidden Winter
Wow this reissue is apparently cursed. Just cracked the seal on mine and it starts skipping on track 1 of side 2. After some anti skate adjustments, got through track 1 with no skips but Star...forget it. No adjustments will fix the skips in that song. Argggh.
Simple fellow Simple fellow
I though that maybe it was something wrong with my tone arm, but I can see from the other comments that skipping is a common issue with this version. I have the limited Gold pressing. They also made a mistake with the coloring when they pressed the vinyl. The disc itself is smooth and flat, but the gold material is all wrinkled and bunched up. Makes the disc look odd.
Mitars Riders Mitars Riders
Bought these to add to the Bowie collection. For an addition, Cool but as far as sound quality it comes off quite compressed for a vinyl...a lot of pops and surface noise on Hunky. Ziggy I don't think sounds too bad. It does sound more of a digital remaster. And I think the treble coulda been better on Hunky. But for the collection, yes. I'll stick to listening to my original presses! Nothing has beat them yet. But I do think the BOWPROMO Sounds Awesome! Get That!
Jia Jia
This pressing uses the same AAA cut as this release (https://www.discogs.com/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-And-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/3642251), which is universally regarded. Perhaps you should check your system.
Lanadrta Lanadrta
hello! Haven´t been able to buy anything on vinyl from Bowie but Blackstar. For this album, which pressing should I look for? The one in black vinyl from Amazon any good?
Utchanat Utchanat
Sound is OK, but not awesome. A bit tight and dry.
Gralmeena Gralmeena
ordered 2 copies from different locatoins and both have torn inner sleeves where the vinyl has cut through the bottom and the edging. Do wish these manufacturers would stop cheapskating and produce a decent quality inner as well as outer. Also the colours look quite bleached to me on outer cover. Finally there is a weird lip at the top of the inner sleeve and on one copy it is creased up adn the other fine.
Cordaron Cordaron
Bought mine in Edinburgh last week for 15 pounds. Sounds fantastic to me on my system. A steal as far as I am concerned.
Beazezius Beazezius
The "gold"is not uniform on the surface for my copy ☹
Samowar Samowar
My B side also skips, I've managed to get it down to only one skip at about 40 seconds into "Star" but I've looked and looked and can't find any visual indications as to why it's skipping.I'm blaming small pieces of the crappy card sleeve. There's no reason that they couldn't have lined it with poly ethylene like the Hunky Dory release.
Beazekelv Beazekelv
I have the same issue with my copy, where the gold material is bunched up, or wrinkled on one side. The B side of the LP also skips in a few places for no apparent reason.
Dagdardana Dagdardana
No skips, but surface noise all over the place, really disappointing.
Cetnan Cetnan
I'm confused because the link in the notes shows an LP that was supposedly an all analog remaster of this album and has the same matrix info as the album above. But the back of the album cover for this gold issue says digital remaster 2012. As with the recent string of Bowie reissues I think this is a digital remaster, the sound lacks true analog warmth and the vocals are too compressed. The bass and drums are given a lot of clarity and punch but upon closer listen sound a bit hollow. I actually don't think the reissue sounds that bad, serves as a nice clean quiet copy to me but sounds like it may lack some of the dynamics that would make it truly great. For $20 might as well grab a copy, vinyl purists would probably steer clear.
Clandratha Clandratha
very good sound and amazing gold vinyl for the 45th anniversary package
Mavegar Mavegar
Got mine the other day, skips all over the place. Not sure if anyone else is having similar issues.
Vonalij Vonalij
Mine skipped during "Star" from the first playing too. With a good clean I have got it down to be only one skip, but it's so annoying for a new record.I can't see anything in the grooves either, but I'll have a good look with a macro lens and see what shows up.But the fact that multiple people have specified Star as the main skipping culprit track, it may actually be pressing issues.
Crazy Crazy
I got mine yesterday and side 1 plays perfectly but star is completely ruined because of skips.
Dagdatus Dagdatus
Having a similar problem. There are a couple places where it gets stuck in a loop as if it were an old, scratched-up record. Disappointing.
mine also has a pretty big skip during star and some surface noise
Arcanefire Arcanefire
Mine has one skip during "star" and has had it since the first play. The rest of the record sounds clean for me though.
Nilabor Nilabor
I actually had the same problem with two copies of the standard black Parlophone repress :(
Mave Mave
will not be available from online only retailers". ---> that's a lie.. Dodax sells it......
Mala Mala
What about this record ? Sound quality ? Thank's
Pruster Pruster
just did open mine and souding great to me, no skippings at all :)but will store it in another inner sleeve.. im not sure the one coming with is a good one..
Mejora Mejora
Like ssk13 noted, same lacquers as the 40th anniversary release (2011?) which is evidently cut from the original tapes. I heard it sounds fantastic.
Yayrel Yayrel
I thought it was great too... crystal, warm and well done
Sounds excellent. It's the same mastering as the 40th anniversary edition which seems to be the best possible re-mastering available.
Brajind Brajind
Just listened through my copy, no skips, pops, or surface noise of any kind. Maybe I got lucky, but my copy sounds great.
Ohatollia Ohatollia
I have this version with similar Matrix/runout, but with blck RCA Victor labels.
Urtte Urtte
B-side didn´t play well, changed for new one and same problem. Going to return it also and buy a different version.
Akisame Akisame
If you are only going to own one copy of this classic album then this is the one to go for. Great analog sound from a new (at the time) mix. The clarity of the vocals on this album is simply stunning. On a decent deck this is practically a religious experience. Definitely one of Bowie's best albums and without a doubt the best vinyl copy out there. The DVD versions are damn good too BTW.
Golden Lama Golden Lama
i have an 'original' US dynaflex and it's a bit of a tossup for me ... i think there's a bit more palpability to that one somehow. But the 40th anniv. pressing isn't as good (or better) as i'd hoped compared to that one. Now I want to hear the 6E/4E UK pressing.
Opilar Opilar
No problem with my copy. Everything is crystal clear and crispy sounding.
Browelali Browelali
This sounds great. I had no issues with skipping or noise on side 2 as some others seem to have.
Naktilar Naktilar
Copy I received was opaque green, not the marbled green of the picture shown. The cover sleeve is a low quality reprint. Sound is pretty good.
Just picked up a copy yesterday, sounds great and in amazing shape! maybe it was just some pressings that had problems.
Morlunn Morlunn
David Bowie had an impressive career at the age of 26 when he broke through on a large scale with this album. Quite by chance was that not, because his alien alter ego Ziggy Stardust gave him all the space to its previous careers as mime artist, painter and actor linking it to solid rock and roll. And with that, he stood at the beginning of the 1970s was one of the founders of the glam rock, which above all England during a storm. Depth Bowie Ziggy Stardust on his talent as a songwriter. Not only the well-known title track and the single Starman but especially the concluding Rock 'n' Roll Suicide (a Symphony in a small three minutes) surprised the audience who knew him only from his previous listening songs. The singer was assisted by the Spiders From Mars that Martians yet striking terrestrial sounded. In addition, Bowie's Ziggy Stardust meant international breakthrough and he would also be the only artist of the glamrockgeneratie, which the American poppubliek managed to get on the knees.This version is released in a beautiful cardboard booklet. On the bonus cd are at an early stage has fallen off tracks, demos and alternate mixes.
Mopimicr Mopimicr
Mine doesn't have the numbered sleeve, how many were pressed?
Helo Helo
My copy comes with a piece of paper that reads number 10482.Who can top that? :)
Grarana Grarana
i own 5 copies of this and the highest # i have is 8398
Aurizar Aurizar
I have an italian reissue from 1977. Do you think this one might sound better?
Gna Gna
Ciao ragazzi, qualcuno mi sa dire se rispetto a questa ristampa italiana, quella più recente parlophone del 2016 ha un suono migliore? Ho ricevuto questo vinile da un amico, ma francamente mi sembra una roba pessima: bassa qualità tipografica, copertina riprodotta dall'originale con i bordi neri, alcune scritte cancellate con un segno nero, bustina del disco senza testi e foto...Insomma, l'ultima ristampa quasi quasi la ricompro se vale la pena per un master migliore
generation of new generation of new
How does this sound? Interested in grabbing one if it sounds like a 72 pressing.
Cashoutmaster Cashoutmaster
One of the first albums in my collection, given to me by my mother - Christmas in King William's Town, South Africa in 1973. One owner from new. My side 2 etching is different:* Matrix / Runout (Etched in side 1 dead wax): APRS 6814-3* Matrix / Runout (Etched in side 2 dead wax): APRS 6815-4
Mildorah Mildorah
Releases should not be allowed to be published without photos of the labels.
Burisi Burisi
This release has absolutely no identity. please delete this airheaded release
Thordibandis Thordibandis
Vuzahn Vuzahn
The second side of my version is close to unplayable. Skips abound (similar to those saying B2 skipped). Will be looking for another version soon. Very disappointed. My version on Man Who Sold the World is excellent.
Biaemi Biaemi
I just brought a copy home from Barnes and Noble. Same skips. It's going back tomorrow.
Akinonris Akinonris
I bought this album at Barnes and noble and had the same problem on side b. I returned it and got a second copy and just played it and the same problem. I will be returning this also. All must be like this.
Velellan Velellan
Mine's very good, sounds great. I agree that the colors on the cover are over-saturated, I've seen other issues that look better than this.
Impala Frozen Impala Frozen
My copy matches most details above but has the HH code
Shak Shak
No problem with mine either. Sounds just great. Go for it!
Azago Azago
I've just bought this one, and the vinyl is clear/purple.
Gldasiy Gldasiy
At a guess, I'd say your's is a pirate copy of this edition. Outside of the Ryko edition, I don't think Ziggy Stardust has been issued officially on coloured vinyl. http://www.illustrated-db-discography.nl/Pirate.htm
Kulwes Kulwes
I received my replacement copy from amazon today and it skipped at exactly at the same point. The start of the first chorus in it ain't easy :( sending it back, hoping 3rd time lucky.
Welen Welen
Mine skipped there also, as well as all the way through star
Kage Kage
Am I the only lucky enough person who got a PERFECT copy of this re-release? :DPeople complained about track B2 skipping too much, but that wasn't the case for me. My record player perfectly :-)
Nettale Nettale
I had the same problem with this album when playing on a cheaper TT I had. Same song, same spot. I haven't had the problem since playing it on my SL 1700 though. I brought it back to the local shop and it didn't skip on their player either.
Felolak Felolak
'Star' is completely unlistenable on this pressing - I went as far as to take my copy back to the store and swap it out, only to have the exact same skips on the second copy. Everything else sounds great, and Star isn't one of the better songs on the LP - so if you don't mind having to skip over it then go for it.
Saberdragon Saberdragon
'Star' also has numerous skips on my copy. Took about 30 seconds to play the entire song my first time through because of how many skips . Pulled the record off the turntable and gave it a thourough cleaning. That helped some, but I still have 3 or 4 skips that may or may not happen in the same places when I play the album. The rest of the album plays fine w/o any skips and sounds great. Weird that one song would be affected. Maybe the plates were dirty. Bought from Hot Topic.
Chi Chi
They know whether this edition of Parlophone is analog? today buy the disc and returned it because in the back of it said "DIGITAL REMASTERED"I appreciate your help .... :)
Umor Umor
Thanks for the reply!!! My personal experience tells me that digital remasters for more ' clean ' that are ruining all the benefits of analog audio (spatial perception of sound, resonances , 3D sound, etc.)My sound system is 100 % analog , not digital processes , and really is very noticeable difference between a artifical digital and an analog natural source.Regards!
Butius Butius
Hi djedzen,yes, this was digitally remastered in 2012 as written in the liner notes of the back cover -but don't believe that any of the vinyl-records produced as new editions never touched the bits and bytes of the digital domain :-)as long as the result is fine, i'm ok with that personally, presupposing they know what to do…
Shliffiana Shliffiana
Comparing this to my 1984 or 1985 German issue it was very close call. I may just slightly prefer the older issue, but this one sounds very good. I've decided to keep the old copy, so I'm waiting for this reissue to get sold out :) Get it while you can, only colours on the cover are perhaps a bit over-saturated.
Zyangup Zyangup
Well I don't know about the rest of you all, but mine sounds immaculate. Really relies greatly on the original mixes/tonalities without altering much.
Jockahougu Jockahougu
I received a Parlophone reissue of this great album from a friend of mine recently and, unfortunately, the song 'Star' is unlistenable. I went out and bought a second copy from my local record store and, sure enough, the record skipped on the exact same song. It's reassuring to hear that other listeners are having the same problem as myself, and with the exact same song. It's safe to say that I won't be buying any more of these Bowie represses, which is a shame as I wanted to add a few to my collection. Bad form, Parlophone! Apart from that, the record sounds fantastic, the best I have ever heard 'Ziggy' sound. Despite this, do be warned - your copy will more than likely be defective. Mine was, twice over.
jorik jorik
Mine skips on Star also. I was thinking of buying a second copy but maybe I will look for an older copy instead. I ordered it from Amazon.
Iraraeal Iraraeal
Same here. Ordered a new copy of this album from Amoeba online and "Star" and "Hang On .." both skipped. Amoeba graciously offered to send a replacement copy and just got it yesterday and "Star" skips on replacement copy as well. Very frustrating.
Fenrinos Fenrinos
mine was defective as well. Parlophone has really lowered their quality control standards.
Unfortunely Goldmine doesn't reflect the real value of the records, i believe it should be more than 20$.
Tygokasa Tygokasa
Putting this on a turntable instead of playing it through an IPOD or on CD is a must to get a real appreciation of the 'White Duke' at his very best. The title track and 'Suffragette City' may warrant all the airplay they garner however the two best tracks on the album are the trippy 'Moonage Daydream' and the raucous Beatle-esque 'It Ain't Easy'. Bowie's best work has been what he's put out with Mick Ronson in the fold and this is just a gem of an album.
Qane Qane
I just receive my second copy of this LP. The quality of the product is somewhat inconstant. I'm not used to Optimal Media GmbH media manufacturer, but I assume they are usually good since they press a lot of records in Germany.Like I said in my first review, it's one of the most quiet record I buy recently, my second copy is dead quiet as well, but the first copy I receive was wrapped a little bit but not to the point of affecting the sound. Also it have a scratch on the last track of the Side A even in the deadwax area who affect the sound of the song.The cover is not well reproduce compare to the original one or any other release I have seen so far (yellowish and blurry). Of course, I don't blame Parlophone records, who is a part of the EMI Group, for their work since they did an amazing work with this release, at least for the transfers of the analog tapes and the remastering. I will class this version as my second favorite one of this album so far, the first one being the vinyl rip of an original UK press that I was able to download in 24-96 bits.My second copy is still a little bit wrapped, but not that much as the first one. The hole is not well centered so I can see the turntable arm moving from the inside to the outside non-stop while playing ( a movement that I can't name in english...), nothing to affect the sound or deform it. So I blame a production quality problem and not the record company itself. Again, the vinyl itself is quiet dead! Not a single clicks and pops. One problem on the second copy is the mysterious one occurrence of a very loud ''Z'' resonance in the vocals, who distort the sound, in the song Ziggy Stardust (one of my favorite). It's happening just after the first chorus part when David start singing and pronounce the word Ziggy. I don't understand why it's happening since it's not on my first copy. I always clean my needle after each side of a record I play, also the needle I use (Audio Technica AT440MLb) always track very well all my records, even the old ones.I tried to clean only that song of the record with an old rca diswasher D4 brush (not the new model who worth nothing) but the Z distortion sound stay there. I clean the whole record with the Spin Clean machine, the Z distortion stay there. It occur only at one place on this record and is not there in my other copy. It's a lot distracting for me and my poor ears. So overall, my only complaints is about the "Z" sound distortions, the hole who is not well centered and the record jacket reproduction. For the reviewer who complain about the Parlophone records company , I just read all his reviews and it's always the same (cut and paste) and all about Parlophone records so don't bother about it.Don't fear to buy this record, it's not a perfect product, but it's much better than some other rereleases I buy in the last year. It's also your best option since the Bowie records price increase insanely since his death. You have to be lucky to find an used NM- or VG+ of the original UK copy for a decent price. The USA and Canadian original releases are pressed on the dynaflex vinyl technology, so very light weight and they are not the best records I own, not quiet at all (I own some of them, Aladdin Sane, Pin ups, Diamond Dogs).Overall, for all those small defects, I give it a good 3 1/2 stars on 5.
Alsath Alsath
Yes ... ignore me and the other commenters all saying the same thing ... copy and paste
Coron Coron
Sucks to hear that other people are having issues with this pressing, but I picked it up yesterday at my local record store and my copy sounds amazing. No scratches, skips, or anything that interferes with playing, and it has excellent sound quality. I wouldn't overreact to a few people who have had problems. Easy five star release for me.
Tejora Tejora
Returning a second copy of this. "Star" skips throughout the song with no visible scratches on the vinyl. Both copies. Bad pressing.
Gavigamand Gavigamand
I have had the same issue. I took my original copy back to the store in which I purchased it. They exchanged it for another copy. Same problem. The clerk and I then played every copy in the store that they had. They all had the same exact issue. I have contacted the label. So far no luck. Just half assed responses.
Geny Geny
I had the same problem. I guess the pressing plant screwed up an entire batch of Bowie records. Such a shame.
Atineda Atineda
Anyone knows what is the actual value of this record ?
Ffleg Ffleg
Goldmine has multiple versions fetching as high as $20 a unit. The one though that is really pricey is LSD-4702 (DJ copy) released as a promo. That one is worth $100 US. Still, this is one album that should never be sold as it is that good!
Rare Rare
5 starts for the quality of sound. It's the best version of this LP I heard (didn't own the original UK press and only an early 80's Canadian pressing). The transfer is apparently made from the original analogue master tape and I must say that I'm very impressed by the quality of the separation of the channel and how good the instruments sound. I also own the Rykodisc remastered CD special edition from 1990 ( https://www.discogs.com/fr/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/1119108 ) and I must admit that this particular release was very bad in several ways, too much EQ apply on the voices and other instruments, a lot of treble and very low bass and also a lot of drop out in some songs on both left and right channel. With this release, I can say that I hear for the first time the real mix as it was release back then. It's the best I heard so far. It have a natural and neutral sound, no unnecessary EQ, they keep it as close as the original mix. No defect in the sound like in someother CD releases. 3 stars for the sleeve. The front sleeve is blurry and the colors are not very good compare with my early 80's copie. Also the back cover is worse than the front. Look like the take a CD booklet and zoom in on the image. 3 stars for the quality of the vinyl itself. It's a quiet one, some minor pops and clicks here and there but nothing too serious. The main 2 problems are a very light wrapped LP who don't affect the sound but it's wrapped and not a flat record. Also, on Side 1 from the middle of the last song to the end and also in the deadwax, it have a major scratch (5 mm long by 3 mm large), so the last song sound not good, don't skip but affect the playing a lot. I don't know what cause this scratch cause the protective inner sleeve is of very good quality. I suspect a problem in the production and inspection quality. Too many LP's to press and not enough vinyl press machine, so they must rush the production and inspection process. I may return my copy for the 2 main defects I mention above but it's already back order and the next batch will not be available before 1-2 months.
MrRipper MrRipper
I didn't write to them... But my first copy that I order from Amazon had some defects for sure, not a perfect record, wrapped just a little bit, scratch at the end of the last song on side A and horrible cover reproduction (too much yellow and blurry image, not crop properly). But for the vinyl itself, it's a very quiet pressing and it sound very good, a lot more of all the other versions I heard. Even download a rip from a first uk pressing and it sound not as good as this one. I returned my first copy because of the defects of the vinyl and still waiting for the new one to come.
Bajinn Bajinn
I have a cassette version with the label number PK 1932, however different from any other versions I've seen on here the band at the top with the "RCA / Stereo / Victor" print is blue instead of red like on the other versions. The cassette itself is the orange background with black text which is found on other versions. The interior is slightly different and doesn't have the photo of Bowie on the reverse side. Can anyone point me to which version this is?
greed style greed style
Label is correct with the release i have: LSP 4702 >26.21089< AS. But the cover and back looks different wrom pictures. Under the RCA logo in the right left top it says "LSP-4702 STEREO" and on the backside where the RCA logo is in the downleft corner. Its a white box that says "LSP 4702, 26.21089 AS, STEREO". Which version is this? Its clearly printed in Germany. But i can't find this version! Can someone help me?
The Apotheoses of Lacspor The Apotheoses of Lacspor
This is the most thin & flexible vinyl I have ever touched...the sound remains warm, clear & vintage.
Cargahibe Cargahibe
I think I have this copy as well, but with some variations in the Matrix/Runout.(Side 1 etched): APRS-6814-7S-A1D R(Side 2: etched): APRS-6815-4S A3N R
Murn Murn
My copt came with a promotion card for a book named: "Moonage Daydream". The insert is squere and size as the booklet.
Stylish Monkey Stylish Monkey
The bass on the track 'Star' on my side B copy of this version of the album sounds really distorted, but the rest of the album sounds relatively fine. Anyone else experience this as an issue with this pressing, or is my copy just weird? I've read that some folks don't think these 1980 re-releases of the Bowie back-catalog are that good sounding, and I wonder if this is an example of that.
Peras Peras
I just got my copy and listened to it all. It is true that track has more bass, but I definitely think that’s how it was planned. In order to have a reference, I listened to a digital version, and that track also sounded bolder than the others. So I think it is not an issue.
Jelar Jelar
HiJust bought one copy and the vinyl is white, no run out matrix writing no infos.Anyone know anything about it?Thanks
GoodLike GoodLike
It’s a cheap 2016 counterfeit version, indeed no matrix info. Released on black and other colour variations. Sound is reasonable.
Mall Mall
You probably just bought a bootleg release, it's already in de db: http://www.discogs.com/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-And-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/7807186
Fohuginn Fohuginn
The stereo separation and imaging are wonderful. This is definitely worth getting.
Nalmetus Nalmetus
melody of you melody of you
I have a 4e/6e no main man with label side 2 on both sides of the Vinyl.Any suggestions ?
shustrik shustrik
the very first ziggy stardust in discogs list has these letters Matrix / Runout (Runout, A-side, etched): BGBS - 0864 - 6E A1AQ Matrix / Runout (Runout, B-side, etched): BGBS 0865 - 4E A2X
Nuadabandis Nuadabandis
I have the 'alternate' interim pressing with 'Stereo' and 'Mainman' publishing credits on the labels (but not the sleeve). Much warmer sounding pressing than others I've heard of similar vintage.
Granirad Granirad
Domarivip Domarivip
Must have for any serious Bowie collector.
IWantYou IWantYou
October 2015:This so-called "Nippon ..."-company (as if it were Japanese) issue is likely not pressed in Japan, as the quality of the outer and inner sleeves are not on par with typically high-quality Japanese packaging. It is currently sold at big record retailers e.g. Amoeba Music, Green Apple, so it's easily had, and, strangely enough, for less $$$ than what Discogs selllers here are currently demanding. (I say this, because usually bay area prices are higher, due to the high cost of living here)Please: Has anybody gambled on this grey-market, and what are your reviews of its sonics? How does it compare to other Ziggy LP reissues? For that matter, how does it compare sonically to its counterpart Ziggy CD from which this double-LP was probably ripped (notice that the bonus cuts here match very closely to the bonus cut selection found on the 1990s Ryko CD reissue)?
Endieyab Endieyab
How does this sound? Please respond if you know.
Frlas Frlas
My copy in clear vinyl sounds well, despite of the 'cuts' between songs. Anyway I think is a decent copy.
Steelrunner Steelrunner
Got a copy yesterday. Looks and sounds great. A little quieter than other albums, but good quality nonetheless.
Thetalas Thetalas
Nice sounding version, bit more bass and a little less thin sounding than some of the other early pressings.
Gaiauaco Gaiauaco
I have a copy nearly identical to this, except with no barcode. I think the matrices match too. Anyone else have a copy like this, so I know if I need to make a new entry for it?
Jake Jake
floydhead42 I have a copy nearly identical to this, except with no barcode. I think the matrices match too. Anyone else have a copy like this, so I know if I need to make a new entry for it? Yes I have. You don't have to make another issue. Date is wrong. If 1980, then barcode. So date is unknown but most certainly mid 70s.
blac wolf blac wolf
I don't think this release has a bar code; neither the one I received today nor the one in the picture have one.
MrDog MrDog
A Canadian variant occurs identical to this with the bottom 'Made in Canada...' sleeve text and the tan Dynaflex labels but without the Price Code info in the top right corner of the rear sleeve.
BoberMod BoberMod
Yes, I have the same variant. . . . .
Zainian Zainian
I have a few MFSL albums now. This one is far and beyond in comparison - highest quality of any record I've ever heard!
Maximilianishe Maximilianishe
I have to agree with the previous comment, the clarity and beefiness they acheived especially with drums is mind blowing. The stereo separation is way more noticiable also giving this classic album a whole new dimension, as if it's the first time you're really hearing this as it was meant to be heard. I can't recommend it enough. It surpassed any expectations I may have had.
Tetaian Tetaian
Single, full laminated cover. Can have sticker "référence 250" on the back
playboy playboy
I have a signature on the back of my copy of this but unsure who's it is... It is on the back above Bowie in the telephone booth - could anyone help me identify?
Fesho Fesho
I have a variant with Matrix / Runout (A-Side) BGBS-0864-6E and (B-side) BGBS 0865-4E. Yes, side A has a dash between BGBS and 0864, side B does not. The number 6 on side a is not a perfect 6.Front and back cover, labels and printed lyrics on the sleeve are all identical. Btw. I am referring to this release: http://www.discogs.com/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-And-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/618952
Faebei Faebei
When the matrix/runout info is hand etched there is always the possibility of slight, minor variations. Would consider this the same as http://www.discogs.com/David-Bowie-The-Rise-And-Fall-Of-Ziggy-Stardust-And-The-Spiders-From-Mars/release/5210659You appear to have a slight oddity though as the labels seem 1st press with with no "MainMan" mentioned. Perhaps the pressing plants wanted to use up the old stock before the new mainman credit labels were ready to go. Either that or it was pressed in the transitional period between the two publishers?
Fearlesshunter Fearlesshunter
It's not as simple as the notes above make it sound - that there are first pressings with Titanic credits with no "MainMan" mentioned on back and the later ones saying "MainMan" on label and back sleeve. In regards to the actual record, the consensus is that -1E / -1E matrices indicate a first issue, followed by a second pressing of -1E / -2E and finally -2E / - 2E. For the 'non-MainMan on sleeve back first editions', there are three identified cover print editions, it seems and - 1E/ -1E and -1 E/-2E matrices can be found in the first two cover variations that were derived from the US artwork and feature a copy and paste catalog number in the upper right of the front.The third variation can be found with labels that say "1-4 MainMan/Chrysalis" (on side 1) and - 2E / - 2E matrices. The RCA logo on front looks more professional on these.The illustrated db discography has a whole discussion on the original UK covers for this release, it is quite a long story. My sleeve points to a third issue (no cut & paste catalog number on front) but that is easy to determine, as -2E's records only came with these. This third version can easily be identified by showing a bit more of the street scene on the far left.The first two cover variations are:Cover A: A clear printed cover with a subtle change to the RCA logo on the front (the middle line SF 8287 ... catalog number being the only change). Cover B: Markedly inferior printing - the image is fuzzy, and the change to the RCA logo is very obvious ( the whole logo was cut and pasted over).As mentioned, both first and 2nd issue discs can be found in either cover A or B.
Ungall Ungall
Very helpful. I have two 1E/2E pressings, one with mAinman on the label/cover A and one with Titanic on the label/cover B. But the pressings sound identical (I guess because they're from the same stampers).
Wizard Wizard
My copy has APRS 6814 5S stamped in the matrix. This copy seems to be the closest to mine aside from those last two matrix numbers. Is mine a later pressing?
elegant stranger elegant stranger
I can strongly recommend this LP - the new remaster is like watching HD TV for the first time, lots of nice percussion details are revealed, you really feel the acoustic guitar arpeggios, and the lead vocals have new clarity. Plus, on the DVD, for the very first time we get Ken Scott's 2003 stereo remix--it's significantly different than the Ziggy we all know and love--give it a listen!
Matty Matty
Just gave it a listen for the first time. It's more narrow. Kind of like Rudy Van Gelder's remixes for Blue Note.
Cozius Cozius
Hi!How would you characterize the 2003 mix?
Gravelblade Gravelblade
I have a German version with those same numbers, but it is not gatefold cover and the vinyl is clear instead of black. How can I know the differences? And please, when this reissue was released?? Thanks!!
Modar Modar
At a guess, I'd say your's is a pirate copy of this edition. Outside of the Ryko edition, I don't think Ziggy Stardust has been issued officially on coloured vinyl. http://www.illustrated-db-discography.nl/Pirate.htm
Dianazius Dianazius
This edition is identical with 4546268. I requested a merging, which did not happen. What is the difference between these releases? I have these matrix / runouts : Matrix / Runout (on label and etched in runoutgroove A-side): APRS-6814Matrix / Runout (on label and etched in runoutgroove B-side): APRS-6815and the laminated cover mentioned with 4546268. Can someone explain the difference?
Winawel Winawel
I think there is a laminated cover and one not laminated ?Also possbliy a third version without " Made in Germany by TELDEC "Telefunken-Decca" Schallpl.-Ges. mbH, Hamburg from Master Recordings of RCA " on inner label
Blacknight Blacknight
I have two different NL-14702 albums. One with the green edge and one without.
Arar Arar
My copy has the dead-wax code (handwritten) - on side one: BGBS 0864-A-9S XXXXXXX INTS 5063 A-SIDE GS, on side two: INTS 5063-B-IT BILBO.TA1PE W A2D.It contains the "loud" mix from "Starman"!
Kearanny Kearanny
Great sounding press the 1E/1E.
Halloween Halloween
Compared my two vinyl version copies - the UK original (SF8287) and the 1983 re-issue (NL 83843). The re-issue clearly is different in sound compared to the original. The bottom - drums and bass - have less power, and the re-issue clearly have a less dynamic sound in general. It's more high pitched and sound a little "canned in" compared to the more open sound on the original.
Coirad Coirad
Sorry. The mo-fi pressing is from the '80s. My bad.
Marg Marg
I totally know what you mean. Have you heard the Mobile Fidelity release from the 1990s? If you can find a copy, you will notice a substantial improvement in sound quality when compared with ANY other reissue. The overall imaging on my system was fantastic. Each instrument easily discernible and properly leveled. I just listened to the 40th Anniversary edition on 180g, and I still like the Mo-Fi remaster better.
Umsida Umsida
This has to be Bowie's best LP, as it is the most listenable, containing consistent ear-appealing pop and rock tunes. Bowie's concept album about rock star Ziggy Stardust has its share of terrible lyrics, but the band, most notably Mick Ronson carries Bowie throughout."Suffragette City" is as near a rock classic as Bowie gets. Ronson's work on "Moonage Daydream" is brilliant noise. One can be fairly amused by Bowie's apocalyptic "Five Years" lo these many years after.I find it easiest to listen to Bowie by disregarding most of his words, which are usually quite silly. Nothing as good as "Life on Mars" on this lp. But nothing as bad as "Bewlay Brothers" or "Kooks" on this one. Bowie is an acquired taste and this is easily his most accessible album